Author: JD

  • When AI Detection Paranoia Kills Creativity

    Test Gadget Preview Image

    The em dash has been part of English writing since the 1800s. Virginia Woolf used it. Kurt Vonnegut loved it. Maya Angelou wielded it masterfully.

    Now, apparently, it’s evidence you’re a robot.

    “If you see em dashes, it’s probably AI,” declared a viral Twitter thread last week. Hundreds of writers nodded along, adding their own “tells” to the list.

    Semicolons? Suspicious.

    Starting sentences with “Moreover”? Dead giveaway.

    Using “delve” or “leverage”? Might as well confess to being ChatGPT.

    We’ve reached peak AI paranoia, and it’s making writers worse, not better.

    The Grammar Police Have Gone Mad

    When did punctuation marks become criminal evidence?

    The em dash hysteria perfectly captures how absurd our AI detection obsession has become. Yes, ChatGPT overuses em dashes, often dropping three into a single paragraph where none belong.

    But the solution isn’t to ban em dashes any more than banning hammers because some people hit their thumbs.

    The problem isn’t the tool; it’s the overuse and misuse of the tool.

    I tested this myself with ChatGPT. Asked it to write a simple three-sentence paragraph, and it managed to cram in three em dashes. That’s not how human writers use punctuation.

    We understand rhythm, pacing, and when enough is enough.

    But now writers are self-censoring perfectly legitimate stylistic choices because someone on social media declared them “AI tells.”

    The Semicolon Witch Hunt

    The semicolon is next on the chopping block. Writers report that using semicolons gets them flagged by AI detectors and suspicious readers.

    This is madness. The semicolon has been connecting related thoughts since the 15th century. It’s not an AI invention.

    It’s a sophisticated punctuation mark that many human writers actually underuse.

    Kurt Vonnegut famously said semicolons were “transvestite hermaphrodites representing absolutely nothing.” But even he acknowledged they had a purpose. He just preferred simpler alternatives.

    Now we’re supposed to avoid semicolons because algorithms sometimes misuse them? That’s like avoiding metaphors because bad writers create mixed metaphors.

    The Vocabulary Vandalism

    It gets worse. Certain words are now considered “AI vocabulary.”

    “Delve” is apparently a dead giveaway. Never mind that it’s been in English dictionaries since the 12th century.

    “Leverage” as a verb? AI speak.

    “Moreover”? Bot language.

    This is vocabulary vandalism. We’re shrinking the English language because we’re afraid of sounding robotic.

    I’ve watched writers apologize for using “whilst” instead of “while” as if choosing a slightly more formal variant somehow proves they’re artificial.

    British writers are now second-guessing their own dialect because Americans have decided “whilst” sounds too AI.

    The em dash paranoia represents a new form of pseudo-science in writing, with accusations spreading despite this being a literary tool used by renowned writers for centuries.

    The Irony of Artificial Naturalness

    Here’s the beautiful irony: in trying to sound more human, these paranoid writing habits make us sound less human.

    Real human writing has variety. We use different sentence structures, punctuation marks, and vocabulary based on mood, audience, and purpose.

    Sometimes we’re formal; sometimes we’re casual.

    Sometimes we use em dashes; sometimes we don’t.

    But AI paranoia is pushing writers toward a narrow, homogenized style that’s anything but natural.

    When you avoid certain words or punctuation marks purely because they might trigger a detector, you’re not writing like a human.

    You’re writing like someone trying very hard to fool a test. And that desperation shows.

    The Detection Game Is Rigged

    The fundamental problem is that AI detection tools don’t work reliably. They generate false positives constantly, flagging human writing as AI-generated and missing obvious AI content.

    I’ve personally fooled detection tools into believing completely AI-generated content was human-written. I asked AI to “rewrite this to sound more human” a few times, and the detectors were completely fooled.

    I’ve also watched these same tools flag my own articles, written entirely by me, as “likely AI.”

    One plagiarism tool even claimed my article was 100% plagiarized and cited my same article I’d published as the source.

    The tools are broken, yet we’re reshaping our writing to appease them.

    Studies show AI detectors suffer from shockingly high false positive rates. While Turnitin claims less than 1% false positives, a Washington Post study revealed a much higher rate of 50%.

    Several prestigious universities, including Vanderbilt, have disabled Turnitin’s AI detection tool due to reliability concerns after “instances of false accusations of AI usage being leveled against students.”

    There is hope, however.  I am collaborating with a company as a consultant, working towards a solution, that isn’t using AI, to verify human written content. The startup is OKHuman, I’ve had a couple of insightful conversations with the co-founder and Ceo Cheena Srinivasan, and I really think their solution has the potential to protect the art of storytelling by humans.  

    The Real AI Tells

    If you must spot AI writing, look for patterns that matter:

    Overuse of transitional phrases: AI loves “Furthermore,” “Moreover,” “Additionally” at the start of every other sentence. Not because these words are inherently artificial, but because it uses them as crutches.

    Repetitive sentence structures: AI often falls into patterns. Every sentence the same length, same structure, same rhythm.

    Emotional emptiness: AI can describe feelings but rarely conveys genuine emotion or personal stakes.

    Surface-level insights: AI excels at saying things that sound profound but lack depth or original perspective.

    Generic examples: AI reaches for the same tired examples everyone’s heard before.

    The tell isn’t using an em dash. It’s using em dashes badly and repeatedly without understanding their purpose.

    Reclaim Your Writing Tools

    Stop letting AI paranoia dictate your stylistic choices.

    Use em dashes when they serve your writing. Deploy semicolons when they connect your thoughts elegantly. Choose “delve” if it’s the precise word you need.

    Your vocabulary and punctuation choices should serve your message and voice, not appease some broken detection algorithm or paranoid reader.

    The goal isn’t to sound unlike AI. It’s to sound like yourself. And yourself might legitimately use any punctuation mark or word in the English language.

    The Real Human Tell

    The most human thing about writing isn’t avoiding certain punctuation marks or words. It’s having something genuine to say and saying it in your own voice.

    AI can mimic style, but it can’t replicate lived experience, personal perspective, or authentic voice. It can use em dashes, but it can’t capture the specific way you think about the world.

    Focus on that authenticity instead of playing grammar police.

    At Writers Without Walls, we’re building a community that celebrates creativity, diversity, and the power of words. We believe in breaking down barriers, not creating new ones based on paranoia.

    We offer writers a space where they can focus on what matters: developing their unique voice, connecting with readers, and telling stories that matter.

    Because when we start treating centuries-old punctuation marks as evidence of artificial intelligence, we’ve lost sight of what makes writing truly human in the first place.

    The em dash isn’t the enemy. Paranoia is.

  • Embracing AI Without Losing Your Writer’s Soul

    Test Gadget Preview Image

    You’ve felt it. That moment of hesitation when your finger hovers over the keyboard, wondering if what you’re about to write will sound “too AI” or “not human enough.”

    It’s the new writer’s block of our generation. Not the struggle to find words, but the fear of finding the wrong ones – ones that might trigger an AI detector or make readers question your humanity.

    This fear is reshaping how we write, often without us even realizing it.

    The Hidden Tax on Your Creativity

    When you write defensively against AI detection, you’re paying a creativity tax you never signed up for.

    You avoid certain phrases that flow naturally. You second-guess word choices. You deliberately introduce imperfections or quirks that don’t serve your message.

    “The psychological impact of AI detection tools on writers can be profound, creating anxiety and self-doubt,” notes research from BBN Times. “Many writers find themselves altering their natural writing patterns just to avoid being flagged.”

    This defensive writing creates a paradox: in trying to sound more human, your writing becomes less authentic.

    **The most human writing comes from not thinking about how human your writing sounds.**

    The False Binary of AI vs Human Writing

    At Writers Without Walls, we’ve watched this tension play out in real time. Our founder, James “JD” Armstrong, sees it clearly:

    “AI will never be able to fully replicate human writing. Because humans are unpredictable, we are passionate, very emotive. We break rules, writing rules, for effect.”

    The truth is, there’s no binary choice between “AI writing” and “human writing.” There’s just writing – some good, some bad, some authentic, some formulaic.

    The question isn’t whether AI is involved, but whether the writing serves its purpose and connects with readers.

    Writers who thrive will be those who see AI as a collaborator rather than a replacement or threat.

    The Authenticity Paradox

    Have you noticed how trying too hard to sound human often makes writing feel less human?

    It’s like someone telling you to “act natural” – immediately, you become self-conscious and do the opposite.

    The same happens when you write with AI detection tools looking over your shoulder. You introduce awkward phrasings and unnatural cadences that a human writer would never naturally create.

    Research shows AI detection tools frequently misclassify human-written content as AI-generated, creating a vicious cycle of self-doubt and second-guessing for writers who are just trying to express themselves authentically.

    In the development of our AI tools, JD tested other tools extensively.  He got the AI detection tools to classify a short article, completely written by AI, as likely to be human written.  He also tested out some plagarism tools that flagged his article as 100% plagairised, citing his own article as the source. 

    Supporting Writers, Not Replacing Them

    The future belongs to tools that enhance human creativity rather than attempting to replicate it.

    This is the philosophy behind the SensAI Triad developed at Writers Without Walls – tools like StorySensAI that analyze and provide feedback on your writing without trying to write for you.

    “My AI tools don’t keep the writers stories. They don’t use their data. They don’t train off their data at all,” explains Armstrong. “As a writer, I want my stories protected as well. So that’s how I built it.”

    StorySensAI assesses stories across 23 different points, providing scores and constructive feedback without the emotional bias of friends or the harshness of online critics.

    It’s designed to be “borderline harsh critic but also supportive and gives you that constructive criticism.”

    The Writing Tool Spectrum

    Not all AI writing tools are created equal. They exist on a spectrum:

    At one end are tools that try to replace writers entirely – the ones where you input a prompt and get a fully-written article or story.

    At the other end are tools that support and enhance your existing writing process – providing feedback, helping with research, or offering suggestions when you’re stuck.

    The first category gets all the attention, but the second category is where the real revolution is happening for serious writers.

    The distinction matters because it determines whether you’re outsourcing your voice or amplifying it.

    The Future Is Collaborative

    The adoption of AI in writing will likely follow the pattern of previous technologies. Armstrong draws a compelling parallel:

    “When ebooks became available, so many writers were adamant that they’d never ever publish their book as an ebook. And there was a lot of resistance to that. And now it’s just commonplace.”

    The same will happen with AI writing tools. Initial resistance will give way to thoughtful integration.

    “Writers using AI effectively will develop new capabilities. Those who choose not to use AI may find themselves pushed to elevate their craft in response – AI’s advancement creates a healthy competition that can drive all writers to reach new heights, regardless of which tools they choose.”

    But this doesn’t mean surrendering your voice to algorithms. It means using AI as a collaborator that handles the mechanical aspects of writing so you can focus on what humans do best: bringing emotion, perspective, and unpredictable creativity.

    Protecting the Trust Between Writers and Readers

    The relationship between writers and readers is sacred. It’s built on trust – trust that the voice on the page is authentic, even if it’s been polished and refined.

    Armstrong warns about the dangers of breaking this trust: “One day, there’s gonna be the next Harry Potter series written by someone, and that person becomes famous… And it’ll be revealed that the writer didn’t write any of it, and it was all done completely by AI. The backlash from the fans will be huge.  And rightly so.”

    This is why transparency matters. Not because using AI tools is wrong, but because misrepresenting how your work was created undermines the foundation of storytelling itself.

    Research on human-AI collaboration shows writers develop fluid relationships with AI that shift based on their goals and needs. The key is being honest about that relationship with yourself and your audience.

    Finding Your Balance

    How do you find the right balance with AI tools in your writing process?

    Armstrong offers this advice: “Like any tool that we use, it’s how we use it that matters. If you use a tool for nefarious purposes, then you’re gonna have nefarious results. If you go in with good intent, if you go in with a clear mind of what you want to achieve with the tool, you will achieve the outcome that you want.”

    Start by defining what aspects of writing you find most challenging or time-consuming. Those are the areas where AI assistance might be most valuable.

    Keep the aspects that bring you joy and fulfillment firmly in your own hands.

    Experiment with different tools and approaches. Some might feel like a natural extension of your process, while others might feel intrusive or limiting.

    Most importantly, remove ego from the equation. See feedback – whether from AI tools or human readers – as valuable data rather than personal criticism.

    The Writer’s Path Forward

    The future of writing isn’t about choosing between human creativity and AI efficiency. It’s about thoughtfully integrating both.

    The writers who thrive will be those who maintain their authentic voice while leveraging AI tools to enhance rather than replace their creativity.

    They’ll use AI to overcome writer’s block, research efficiently, and receive objective feedback – but they’ll keep the soul of their writing firmly in human hands.

    They’ll approach AI with curiosity rather than fear, seeing it as one more tool in a long history of writing technologies from the printing press to word processors.

    And they’ll remember that at its core, writing has always been about one human mind connecting with another – a connection no algorithm can fully replicate.

    Your voice matters. Don’t let fear of AI detection shape it into something it’s not.

  • Introducing Accountabuddies

    Introducing Accountabuddies

    Your Writing Accountability Partner

    How Accountabuddies Work

    The Power of Partnership

    Personal Discovery

    Rewards and Recognition

    Your Partnership, Your Identity

    accountabuddy reward and support program. Find your accountabuddies.

    Beyond Pairs: Community Challenges

    Join the Movement


  • When AI Detection Paranoia Kills Creativity

    When AI Detection Paranoia Kills Creativity

    The Grammar Police Have Gone Mad

    The Semicolon Witch Hunt

    The Vocabulary Vandalism

    The Irony of Artificial Naturalness

    The AI Detection Game Is Rigged

    The Real AI Tells

    Reclaim Your Writing Tools

    The Real Human Tell

  • Embracing AI Tools Without Losing Your Writer’s Soul

    Embracing AI Tools Without Losing Your Writer’s Soul

    The Hidden Tax on Your Creativity

    The False Binary of AI vs Human Writing

    The Authenticity Paradox

    Supporting Writers, Not Replacing Them

    AI tools built by JD

    The Writing Tool Spectrum

    The Future Is Collaborative

    Protecting the Trust Between Writers and Readers

    Finding Your Balance

    The Writer’s Path Forward

  • How to Grow Your Readership

    How to Grow Your Readership

    What is Writers Without Walls?

    Introducing Wisdom Without Walls: Marketing Education for Authors

    Grow your readership with Wisdom Without Walls
    Wisdom Without Walls

    Exclusive Community Discounts Available Now!

    Essential Marketing Courses for Authors

    Double the Free Resources: Two Prompt Packs Available

    Why Authors Need Marketing Skills in 2025

    Join the Writers Without Walls Community

    Start Building Your Author Platform Today

    JD's digital signature
    JD's brand logo
  • Level Up Together: Our New Referral Program is LIVE!

    Level Up Together: Our New Referral Program is LIVE!

    Chaos in creating the Referral Program
    Chaos in creating the Referral Program

    How the NEW Referral Program Works

    Our Fair Reward Structure

    Redeeming Your Hard-Earned Rewards

    More Than Just Credits

    Ready to Start Referring?

    JD's digital signature
    JD's brand logo
  • Unlock Your Voice: Share Your Perspective

    Unlock Your Voice: Share Your Perspective

    JD's digital signature
    JD's brand logo
  • Grow With Us: Introducing the Writers Without Walls Referral Program

    Grow With Us: Introducing the Writers Without Walls Referral Program


    JD's digital signature
    JD's brand logo
  • Call for Submissions: Write for Writers Without Walls

    Send your submissions for our blog
    Send your submissions for our blog
    JD's digital signature
    JD's brand logo
×